PHIL
103: Critical Thinking
Colombetti
|
|
|
Course
Description: |
|
Students can obtain an official syllabus in class.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR PHIL 103:
…what a student will know or be able to do at the completion of the
course.
o SLO
1. When presented with an argument,
the student is able to assess the soundness
of the argument by assessing deductive
validity using appropriate deductive techniques (and assessing the truth or
epistemic value of the premises using reliable sources of information).
o SLO
2. When presented with an argument,
the student is able to assess the cogency
of the argument by assessing inductive
strength using appropriate inductive techniques (and assessing the truth or
epistemic value of the premises using reliable sources of information).
o SLO
3. When presented with a
theoretical hypothesis or a pseudo-scientific claim, the student is able to
evaluate it using appropriate explanatory criteria.
o SLO 4. At the end of the course, the student is able to construct a novel, interesting, and logically correct argument that avoids fallacies. The student is also able to represent the logical structure of the argument (in standard logical form), as well as express and defend the argument as a short essay.
SLOS 1, 2, and 3 will be
assessed with chapter exams and the final exam.
SLO 4 will be assessed by a short essay assignment due near the end of the
semester.
See the evaluation criteria for Critical Thinking SLOS: CT Rubric
See also evaluation criteria for essays:
Standards for Essays
____________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|